Prediction of Angela Geib vs Laura Sham Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

HEAD TO HEAD

A. Geib vs L. Sham

Angela Geib
Angela Geib

Flag AUT AUT

w
l
w
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
Laura Sham
Laura Sham

Flag RSA RSA

l
w
l
l
l
l
l
l
w
l

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

47
Age
49
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
646
Best Rank
718
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Geib 1 - 0 Sham

They have played 2 sets in total, with Angela Geib winning 2 and Laura Sham winning 0. The last match between Angela Geib and Laura Sham was at the ITF Cairo, 14-11-1994, Round: R3, Surface: Clay, with Angela Geib getting the victory 6-0 6-1.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Geib1
Sham0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3ITF Cairo(11-14-94)

Clay
AUT Flag
Angela Geib
6
6
RSA Flag
Laura Sham
0
1

A. Geib vs L. Sham H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
23.08% (9-30)Career Total W/L33.33% (8-16)
1Clay0
1Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

A. Geib vs L. Sham Match Preview:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Angela Geib has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Laura Sham has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Angela Geib, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Laura Sham has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Angela Geib has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Laura Sham has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Angela Geib has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Laura Sham winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Angela Geib has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 25% (W/L 8/24), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 17% (W/L 1/5). Laura Sham has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 25% (W/L 4/4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 25% (W/L 4/12).
  • Player level: In the last year, Angela Geib has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Laura Sham has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Angela Geib winning 1 times and Laura Sham being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Angela Geib winning 2 and Laura Sham winning 0.
  • The last match between Angela Geib and Laura Sham was at the ITF Cairo, 14-11-1994, Round: R3, Surface: Clay, with Angela Geib getting the victory 6-0 6-1.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Angela Geib has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Laura Sham has played against players with an average rank of 0.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Angela Geib has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Laura Sham has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Angela Geib has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Laura Sham has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Angela Geib vs Laura Sham Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

A. Geib vs L. Sham H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won0
12Games Won1
0:0:0Average Match Time0:0:0
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Geib 0%, Sham 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Geib 0%, Sham 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Geib 0%, Sham 0%.

A. Geib Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
ClayMallorca 10K - 18-11-1996

R3

CZEZ. Lesenarova
L
6-0 6-4
ClayValasske Mezirici 10K - 19-08-1996

R3

CZEL. Prusova
L
7-5 6-3
ClayFiumicino 10K - 15-07-1996

R3

FRAV. Courmes
L
6-1 6-2
ClayMaribor 10K - 24-06-1996

R3

SLOK. Srebotnik
L
6-0 6-1
ClaySalzburg 25K - 10-06-1996

R3

RSAJ. Steck
L
6-1 6-1

L. Sham Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
ClayNairobi 10K - 19-03-1996

R3

AUTN. Aigner
W
6-1 6-3

R4

AUTN. Melch
L
6-1 6-0
HardPretoria 10K - 26-02-1996

R3

SUIA. Buergis
L
6-2 7-5
HardITF Norfolk - 03-07-1995

R3

JPNY. Yamagishi
L
7-5 2-6 6-3
HardITF Hilton Head - 26-06-1995

R3

NORL. Ullring
L
4-5 RET
banner

A. Geib vs L. Sham Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
23.08% (9/30)YTD Win/Loss33.33% (8/16)
25.61% (21/61)Sets Win/Loss39.62% (21/32)
40.34% (284/420)Games Win/Loss45.69% (212/252)
16.67% (1/5)Hard Win/Loss25.00% (4/12)
25.00% (8/24)Clay Win/Loss50.00% (4/4)
0.00% (0/1)Indoor Hard W/L0% (0/0)
1st MatchAverage Match Time1st Match
571.64Average Opponent Rank484.92
25.93% (7/20)Challenger W/L33.33% (7/14)
23% (9/39)Best of 3 Sets Win %35% (8/23)
0% (0/1)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)50% (1/2)
25% (1/4)Deciding Set Win %33% (2/6)
73% (11/8)1st Set Won, Won Match82% (11/9)
27% (11/3)1st Set Won, Lost Match18% (11/2)
4% (28/1)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (13/0)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

Wed, 26 Nov, 01:05 PM
Prediction
SUIA. Ritschard
CZED. KellovskyLL
W1
1.198
W2
3.95
Thu, 27 Nov, 02:00 PM
Prediction
DENE. Moller3
POLD. Michalski
W1
1.42
W2
2.61
Thu, 27 Nov, 03:30 AM
Prediction
AUSJ. McCabe6
AUSM. Polmans
W1
1.64
W2
2.1
Wed, 26 Nov, 05:00 PM
Prediction
USAM. Kuharq
ARGC. M. Zarate
W1
2.49
W2
1.46
Thu, 27 Nov, 05:00 PM
Prediction
USAA. Ayeniq
ARGN. Kicker6
W1
2.49
W2
1.46
Wed, 26 Nov, 06:30 PM
Prediction
ARGL. Midon7
USAS. Kirchheimer
W1
1.56
W2
2.24